Posts Tagged → Marco Rubio
JD Vance’s toxic Hail Mary
Voters on the right are upset, even bewildered, about the customary mid-term beating the “ruling party” took in Tuesday’s election. This kind of electoral sea change takes place something like 90% of the time in American history, so while painful, it should surprise nobody.
What is truly shocking about the election is a) the large number of Islamists and communists who were voted in as Democrats by Democrat voters, and b) the Democrat takeover of what had been traditionally deeply conservative / Republican areas in Texas, Iowa, Kansas, elsewhere. These two things are of real note and worth studying, and pushing back against. Whether the GOP has the balls, that is a separate issue.
The Democrat Party has accepted the Islamists and communists with open arms, so that is who and what the Democrat Party now is.
While ironic only to historians that the political party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, and black voter suppression serves as the host body for anti-America Islamists and communists, the practical effect is that a lot of middle income Americans who believe in family, hard work, savings accounts, and capitalism, are also gleefully marching alongside the black flag of ISIS and the hammer and sickle flag of the former USSR and the current CCP, and also voting for their candidates.
Such is their loyalty to the political party of slavery and the KKK, or their blindness to what voting for these kinds of candidates really means in terms of anti-America policy. Go figure. I left that movement a while ago, and feel much better for it.
As a former member of said party, I never could figure out all that mess, and so I am loyal to no political party, but rather save my loyalty for America’s founding principles, our Constitution, and our American flag. This narrow but traditional perspective alone now puts me somewhere on the right of the Republican Party, though my policy views have changed very little since I started voting over forty years ago, as a rural Democrat.
So amidst all of the expected post-election hand-wringing, gnashing of teeth, finger pointing, bitching, caterwauling, etc comes a surprisingly swift stab-in-the-back of President Trump by his own vice president, JD Vance. And what a play it is! It is a hellaciously toxic Hail Mary pass at the last second of game time. JD Vance is staking out his own territory and looking for his own constituency.
After the Trump Administration had huddled on subsequent political messaging, blown yesterday from a high pressure honey wagon all over the political landscape is JD Vance’s own take on why the 90% probability electoral turn happened Tuesday: The Jews did it.
Relying on some fictional pollster JD Vance won’t reveal and cannot reveal, he says Tuesday’s voters were apparently most motivated by 1) end the “Iran war”, 2) focus on cost of living and inflation, 3) put America and Americans first, and 4) change America’s relationship to Israel.
This list bears a remarkable similarity to the messaging of JD Vance’s buddy, obsessive Jew-hater Tucker Carlson. So maybe, probably, Tucker Carlson is the mysterious “pollster” JD Vance says he is relying on. In JD Vance’s defense here, several big political polling firms did recently reveal themselves and their fictitious polling results to be completely made up. So in that broad vein, Tucker Carlson could very well be counted as a “pollster,” at least enough for JD Vance to make the claim. Tucker Carlson as a fake and unreliable pollster is in good company in that political polling business.
No pollsters or opinion surveyors anywhere else have recounted these four issues in phone or exit polling, or anything close to them.
Yes, Americans were upset about high gas prices (and by extension high food prices), which are directly attributable to the unnecessarily prolonged fighting with Iran’s effect on global oil. But they are not saying the “Iran war” verbatim; that is strictly a Carlsonian construct. Nor is anyone outside of the Tucker podcastisphere obsessively bitching about Israel non-stop, except the Islamists, for whom genociding the Jews and the Christians is a core belief of their ideology. Nor does any normal American voter make being a good America First American conditional on having a bad or venemous relationship with Israel, a fellow democratic western nation that has helped America hugely over the past 75 years.
There is no logical or reasonable tradeoff between America and Israel, except with the Jew haters, like Carlson, for whom all Jews, including little kids and eye doctors, are evil and must be eradicated.
That JD Vance’s first three issues all tightly revolve around the last one, Israel, and by direct extension “The Jews,” is the tell. His four point list is a Carlson construct, and Carlson is the mysterious pollster. And how sad and shameful it is that JD Vance has used this mentally retarded envious loser excuse to stab President Trump in the back, so quickly after a very painful electoral loss.
If anyone embodies the worst of the bad character traits attributed to Jews by their envious haters, it is JD Vance here.
Tucker Carlson quit the Republican Party months ago, and announced the formation of a new political party with fellow loon Marjorie Taylor Green. JD Vance did not lift a finger to defend President Trump against Carlson’s crazyman invective (“Trump is the anti-Christ”) or MTG’s invective or the invective of other desperate attention seeking loons like Thomas Massie or Joe Kent. JD Vance screwed up the military effort to prevent Iran from getting nuclear bombs by declaring a ceasefire, and then blames Israel. And then goes off script and stabs President Trump in the back for his own benefit.
JD Vance’s backstabbing Hail Mary long throw here is a political message to all fellow Jew haters to gather under his banner, presumably the resurrection of the American Nazi Party. And how sad to see Donald Trump, Jr., “liking” JD Vance’s statement on “X.” Then again, Donald Trump, Jr., is a party to the 1789 Capital Fund, run by Iranian jihadi, Omar Malik, one of JD Vance’s big funders and the funder of Carlson’s own media business. C’mon and tell me that all of this is not weirdly ironic and kind of sick and twisted.
Like, following the money bread crumbs where they lead us, JD Vance is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, and Qatar, and Iran. And the Arab Gulf states like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, on whose behalf America attacked Iran. This explains his toxic messaging and associations and his anti-Jew deflections.
I myself will be immediately championing Marco Rubio for president in 2028. America First, baby!
JD Vance should buy a house in Qatar, next door to Tucker Carlson. Neither are America First, hell I am unsure if either of them are even Americans any more. On the flipside, Marco Rubio has given pro America speech after pro America speech, pro America action after pro America action, and we know he is the embodiment of America First.
Give appeasement a chance
Yes, the “Iran Deal” is appeasement of a dangerous American enemy. Yes, it looks like disgraced British prime minister Neville Chamberlain has arisen from the dead, and declared “Peace in our time” with Iran.
(Chamberlain traveled to Germany three times in 1938 to meet with Adolf Hitler, who pinky- promised him that Germany had no intention of invading more of Czechoslovakia, or any of Poland, or France, or England or or or… and then Germany invaded all of those places, and more, and proved how foolish it is to believe the promises of totalitarian homicidal maniacs like Adolf Hitler or the Iranian mullahs)
Yes, American administrations have rightly said for at least fifty years “We do not negotiate with terrorists.” And what is the “Iran Deal” but direct negotiation, and direct bilateral signatures by the American president, no less, which fully legitimizes the terrorists. This tends to undermine our own credibility in the long run, with terrorists and their victims alike.
Yes, setting “red line” one after another, only to run out of red pens and out of buckets of red paint to draw any more red lines, because Iran had already crossed all of them, and then not holding Iran accountable for crossing them, sends the wrong message. It tells Iran that no matter what, they can probably get away with murder, if they call it something else.
Yes, throwing our allies under the bus (Israel, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait) when they no longer suit our superficial goal of creating the impression of a “peace deal” is really bad form. And then criticizing Israel for defending its citizens against cross-border rocket fire, because self-defense might mess up the “peace deal,” puts the self-defender in the hot seat, and Iran, the aggressor, in the driver’s seat. This is just bad chess.
One of my greatest concerns is that JD Vance, the Iran deal’s greatest salesman, is so un-likable and abrasive and arrogant, that as the the de facto nominee in 2028, he will cost us the presidency. I 1000% want a Republican president to win the 2028 election, and more and more it looks like Marco Rubio is the one to do it. JD Vance has a sour personality, he just radiates hostile disdain for anyone who disagrees with him, and I do not believe enough Americans will vote for him to make him president. This is perhaps my biggest issue with the “Iran deal”: The wrong guy is trying to sell it.
We can go on and on here, and critique the “Iran deal” line by line, idea by idea, action by action. But, we need to give appeasement a chance.
No, the Iran deal” is not peace by any definition, and it comes with a lot of warnings to Iran, and promises of more bombings if Iran does anything wrong. Yes, it is open appeasement, and no, Iran is unlikely to stick to its end of the deal. However, consider the short-term benefits:
a) Gasoline prices dropped immediately, b) oil markets began leveling out immediately, c) Republicans have less of a likelihood of carrying the millstone of high fuel prices and a less-than-perfect economy around their necks as they enter the mid-term election season, which culminates this November. If the Republicans can survive this election cycle, and maintain control of the US House and the US Senate, then President Trump is not a lame duck for 2027 and 2028, but rather a jet-fueled, super-charged, hypersonic vehicle for even more much needed change.
And if Iran does in fact go back to its old terrorist ways, then Daddy Trump will have no problem reminding them who carries the belt.
So, yes, yes, I know, people are unhappy with the “Iran deal,” but let us give it a chance to bear fruit, if not for years, then at least for the next few months.